Discuss a dilemma from a legal and professional viewpoint Essay

Discuss a dilemma from a legal and professional stand - Essay ExampleAssessing Capacity f. Key Points about Mental Capacity Act (2005) g. UK Statutes of law of nature 3. sea captain Implications of the Case a. Mental Capacity in checkup Profession b. Consent to Treatment c. Principles of Medical Laws d. Medical Principles 4. Conclusion Mental Capacity and Consent Scenario in Clinical Practice Alexander mob is a 19 years old deaf teenager admitted in a mental institution for paranoiac personality. Alexander was born deaf and abused by his siblings and friends because of his disability. He grew up believing that everyone is trying to plot of land a mischief against him. James parents admitted him in the mental institution because his paranoid disorder affected his academics, sociable life and relationships with other people. While at the mental institution, Alexanders mental disorder escalate when he saw doctors communicating and laughing. He thought that they were laughing at h is disability and were plotting to harmful activities against him with their medical exam practice. James became violent towards the mental health providers and other patients. He was sedated and kept in isolation piece his mental health treatment began. During his treatment, James was diagnosed with early symptoms of leukemia. Doctors summoned his parents and informed him that immediate treatment would eliminate the crabby person. However, James discardd this treatment because he believed that God intentionally planned for his deafness and leukemia, which means that he wanted the cancer to take its own course. The doctors respected James wishes in the presence of an attorney and he received hospice business organization for the remaining months. In 1994 in England, a similar case of mental capacity and consent occurred when a 68 years old man refused treatment. The case is referred to as Re C (Adult Refusal of Treatment) 1994 1 WLR 290, where Mr. C was confined in a mental hos pital because of a prolonged paranoid schizophrenia (Tan 4). He further explains that Mr. C had a gangrenous foot that threatened his wellbeing if untreated by amputation. However, Mr. C refused treatment and filed a case to deter doctors from amputating his foot in future. Justice Thorpe ruled in his promote because his delusions and mental illness did not affect his capacity to listen, understand and fuck off solid judgments about his desires (Tan 4). juristic Implications of the Case In the case of James and the medical professionals in the mental institution, his wishes and beliefs were granted after a thorough consultation. Below is a discussion and analysis of the impact of James case on UKs legal system. Capacity in Law Capacity is legally defined as individuals ability and granting immunity to make their own decisions or take necessary actions that will affect their own lives (Law 2). She further explains that the Law Commission of UK implemented a Mental Capacity Act th at empowered and encouraged people to make their own decisions about important issues in their lives. Patients in the UK that refuse emergency treatment must be legally competent by exhibiting a high capacity. The wishes of these patients are respected after proving to the court that they shed mental stability to reason clearly and deliberate (Buchanan 2). They should hold appropriate objectives and values concerning their refusal of treatment. The law requires patients that refuse emergency medical care to appreciate and acknowledge their current circumstances. Patients are required to understand the schooling presented by their doctors and finally communicate their desired choice,